This is an old revision of the document!


CBS lawyers say that apart from both being tardigrades, these two characters are nothing alike. Illustration/AxaMonitor

FEBRUARY 12, 2019 | 4 MINS READING TIME

CBS: Tardigrades Creator ‘Manufactured Similarities’

CBS and Netflix’s lawyers made a remarkable claim in their February 12, 2019, motion to dismiss the copyright suit against Star Trek: Discovery by Anas Abdin, developer of the Tardigrades videogame: That Abdin tried to “manufacture the appearance of similarity” between his work and Discovery:

These “similarities” are utterly trivial when comparing the absence of any coherent plotline in Plaintiff’s work to the richly developed and varied stories running through the approximately 11 hours of Defendants’ allegedly infringing series.1)

No Challenge (For Now) to Access Claim

The motion doesn’t challenge Abdin’s allegation CBS employees accessed and copies his work, but only for the purpose of seeking dismissal since that assumption isn’t integral to the argument the two works aren’t substantially similar.

MOTION TO DISMISS You can read the 31-page motion. Download (7.4 MB PDF).

Proving access to and copying of Abdin’s published work is important, though, but being dealt with separately by the judge.

No Substantial Similarity

CBS’ lawyers argue an actual comparison between Discovery and Anas Abdin’s never-published Tardigrades videogame reveals no substantial similarities between the two.

Watch

THIS ‘TARDIGRADE HUG’ sequence appears only in this 14-second video posted to YouTube on July12, 2017, just two months before Star Trek: Discovery aired.


The motion noted that the actual registered copyrighted work is not the unfinished game, nor Abdin’s 23 short concept YouTube videos, nor his blog posts, but instead a “treatment” consisting of text and static artwork. Abdin claims the Tardigrades videos and other blog posts were also infringed. In the motion, CBS disagreed:

  • The Tardigrade hug sequence pointed to as proof of infringement is a 13-second video posted on YouTube in July 2017, two months before Discovery’s premiere but long after the show had been developed and filmed.
  • “The only ‘similarities’ between the game and Discovery, says CBS, “is that both tardigrades are enlarged and can move through space. Space-faring tardigrades — including enlarged fictional tardigrades — are, of course, not original to Plaintiff.”
  • Other purported similarities are too generically described to qualify for copyright protection, according to the motion.

Other Alleged Similarities

The motion also focused on a number of “other purported ‘similarities’ alleged to exist between [Abdin’s] works and random elements plucked from … Discovery’s first season.”2). They included:

Uniforms

In his complaint, the defense said Abdin claimed his characters’ uniforms and those in Discovery were substantially similar because of their colors (e.g., white for medical officers) and that both works’ space suits “egg-shaped” helmets.

Stock Characters

Abdin’s legal complaint pointed to similar characters in the two works, including:

  • A blond white male biologist, though the two work in different fields. (Stamets on Discovery)
  • A “darker complexion homosexual male with black hair” and facial hair, though the two were of different ethnic backgrounds. (Dr. Culber on Discovery)
  • An “African-American female.” (Burnham on Discovery)
  • A redheaded woman. (Tilly on Discovery)
CBS contends Netflix should not be a party to this lawsuit.

Remove Netflix from Case

Netflix should be removed as a defendant because its streaming Discovery internationally falls outside the jurisdiction of U.S. copyright law, the motion argued. Its only domestic act was signing a license agreement, which by itself is perfectly legal.

Why This Case Matters

Abdin has become a cause célèbre among YouTubers and bloggers who intensely dislike Discovery, and who resent CBS for suing Alec Peters over his own infringing “professional, independent Star Trek film,” Axanar.

What Happens Next?

Judge Lorna G. Schofield allowed Abdin's lawyers to try to link CBS employees to the Tardigrades game. A status letter also filed by both sides’ lawyers gave notice that subpoenas are expected to be served on both CBS and Valve, the owner of the Steam Greenlight platform which featured the game.

Overly Broad Subpoenas

CBS said it planned to contest the subpoenas as overly broad, a common defense tactic in these situations.

Also, document demands and written questions were submitted to the defendants on January 25 by Abdin’s attorneys. CBS argued these, too, are overly broad.

Plaintiff's Response

A response by Abdin’s lawyers to the dismissal motion is due March 5.

1)
“Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint,” Abdin v. CBS et al., Docket 56, p. 28, 2/12/19
2)
“Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint,” Abdin v. CBS et al., Docket 56, p. 13, 2/12/19
This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree leave the website.More information about cookies