Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
void_dire [2017/01/03 21:27] – created Carlos Pedrazavoid_dire [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP rightalign>
 +{{::img_1979.jpg|}} \\
 +<wrap lo><wrap lo>//Photo/Robert Couse-Baker//</wrap></wrap>
 +</WRAP>
 +
 ===== Attorneys Focus on Axanar Jury Selection ===== ===== Attorneys Focus on Axanar Jury Selection =====
 {{TOC}} {{TOC}}
Line 6: Line 11:
  
 Both sides in the Axanar copyright infringement suit have asked for a jury trial, banking on their ability to find jurors sympathetic to their case. Both sides in the Axanar copyright infringement suit have asked for a jury trial, banking on their ability to find jurors sympathetic to their case.
 +
 +Attorneys submitted their proposed questions to U.S. District Court [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]] on December 30, 2016. The first days of Axanar's upcoming January 31 trial was to be spent on selecting the jury. The process is formally known as //voir dire// (from the French, literally, "to see, to speak"), and it's meant to ensure jurors are unbiased.
  
 <WRAP right round info 50%> <WRAP right round info 50%>
-Background on jury selection for civil trials.+<wrap lo>**PICKING A JURY** [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_48|About juries]] in federal civil trials, and how they are selected ([[http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/jurselpro.pdf/$file/jurselpro.pdf|PDF]]).</wrap>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
-Attorneys submitted their proposed questions to U.S. District Court [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]] on December 30, 2016. The first days of Axanar's upcoming January 31 trial was to be spent on selecting the jury. The process is formally known as //voir dire// (from the French, literally, "to see, to speak), and it's meant to ensure jurors are unbiased. 
  
 According to [[http://semanticshenanigans.com|Semantic Shenanigans]] writer and retired attorney Janet Gershen-Siegel, one of the hosts of the popular Star Trek podcast, The G&T Show: According to [[http://semanticshenanigans.com|Semantic Shenanigans]] writer and retired attorney Janet Gershen-Siegel, one of the hosts of the popular Star Trek podcast, The G&T Show:
  
 > Voir dire essentially consists of the questions the lawyers can ask the prospective jurors. So recognize most of these Axanar Pretrial Voir Dire questions are rather standard, (e.g., questions concerning educational levels, whether a person has seen press coverage of the case, etc.).(([[http://www.semanticshenanigans.com/axanar-pretrial-voir-dire-lcs-petition/|"Axanar Pretrial Voir Dire and LCS Petition," SemanticShenanigans.com]], Janet Gershen-Siegel, 12/31/16.)) > Voir dire essentially consists of the questions the lawyers can ask the prospective jurors. So recognize most of these Axanar Pretrial Voir Dire questions are rather standard, (e.g., questions concerning educational levels, whether a person has seen press coverage of the case, etc.).(([[http://www.semanticshenanigans.com/axanar-pretrial-voir-dire-lcs-petition/|"Axanar Pretrial Voir Dire and LCS Petition," SemanticShenanigans.com]], Janet Gershen-Siegel, 12/31/16.))
- 
 ==== Defendants' Voir Dire Questions ==== ==== Defendants' Voir Dire Questions ====
  
Line 201: Line 205:
 protection under the law? \\ protection under the law? \\
 29. Some people think that intellectual property is different than regular property, and that stealing intellectual property is not as bad as stealing regular property. Do you agree with that? \\ 29. Some people think that intellectual property is different than regular property, and that stealing intellectual property is not as bad as stealing regular property. Do you agree with that? \\
- 
  
 <-- <--
Line 224: Line 227:
 39. CBS Studios and Paramount Pictures are large companies. Do you 39. CBS Studios and Paramount Pictures are large companies. Do you
 think that you can treat them equally with the individual defendants, and that you will not be swayed by sympathy for the “smaller guy”? \\ think that you can treat them equally with the individual defendants, and that you will not be swayed by sympathy for the “smaller guy”? \\
-40. Do you know Jonathan Zavin, David Grossman, Jennifer Jason, or their firm Loeb & Loeb LLP, who are the attorneys for the plaintiffs? \\+40. Do you know Jonathan Zavin, David Grossman, Jennifer Jason, or their firmLoeb & Loeb LLP, who are the attorneys for the plaintiffs? \\
  
 <-- <--
---> Expert Witnesses# +--> Witnesses# 
-41. You may hear testimony from a number of expert witnesses. Are you acquainted with or do you know anything about the following potential witnesses:Christian Tregillis +41. You may hear testimony from a number of expert witnesses. Are you acquainted with or do you know anything about the following potential witnesses: \\ 
-b. Henry Jenkins +  * [[witness_list#defense_s_witnesses|Christian Tregillis]] 
-42. You may hear testimony during trial from a number of other witnesses. +  * [[witness_list#defense_s_witnesses|Henry Jenkins]] 
-Are you acquainted with or do you know anything about the following potential +42. You may hear testimony during trial from a number of other witnesses. Are you acquainted with or do you know anything about the following potential witnesses: \\ 
-witnesses: +  * [[Alec Peters]] 
-a. Alec Peters +  * [[perks|Diana Kingsbury]] 
-b. Diana Kingsbury +  * [[terry_mcintosh|Terry McIntosh]] 
-c. Terry McIntosh +  * [[gossett-subpoena|Christian Gossett]] 
-d. Christian Gossett +  * [[cbs_officials|Bill Burke]] 
-e. Bill Burke +  * [[cbs_officials|John Van Citters]] 
-f. John Van Citters +  * [[o_rourke_deposition|Dan O’Rourke]] 
-g. Dan O’Rourke +  * [[Robert Meyer Burnett]] 
-h. Robert Meyer Burnett +  * [[podcast-40-fact-check|Bill Hunt]] 
-i. Bill Hunt +  * [[witness_list|Reece Watkins]] 
-j. Reece Watkins +  * [[fan_film_factor|Jonathan Lane]] 
-k. Jonathan Lane +  * [[witness list|Liz Kalodner]] 
-l. Liz Kalodner +  * [[witness list|Justin Lin]] 
-m. Justin Lin +  * [[witness list|J..J. Abrams]] 
-n. J.J. Abrams + 
-43. Do you read entertainment blogs like The Hollywood Reporter? Do +<-- 
-you read “amateur” or online blogs, or listen to podcasts about Star Trek or other science fiction works? Do you read any “tech” blogs, such as Tech Crunch, +--> Reading Habits# 
-Mashable, Giga Om, or Gizmodo?+43. Do you read entertainment blogs like The Hollywood Reporter? Do you read “amateur” or online blogs, or listen to podcasts about Star Trek or other science fiction works? Do you read any “tech” blogs, such as Tech Crunch, Mashable, Giga Om, or Gizmodo? 
 + 
 +<-- 
 +--> Crowdfunding#
 44. Have you ever donated money via crowdfunding for fan fiction, 44. Have you ever donated money via crowdfunding for fan fiction,
 including on Kickstarter or Indiegogo? including on Kickstarter or Indiegogo?
-45. Have you read or heard anything about this case? + 
-46. Do you think that you are good at deciding if someone is telling the +<-- 
-truth? Do you think that you are not good at deciding if someone is telling the truth?+--> Judging this Lawsuit# 
 +45. Have you read or heard anything about this case? \\ 
 +46. Do you think that you are good at deciding if someone is telling the truth? Do you think that you are not good at deciding if someone is telling the truth? \\
 47. Do you believe that it is appropriate to make money from someone 47. Do you believe that it is appropriate to make money from someone
-else’s work? +else’s work? \\ 
-48. Have you seen or heard anything that would make it hard for you to +48. Have you seen or heard anything that would make it hard for you to guarantee that you will judge the parties equally? \\ 
-guarantee that you will judge the parties equally? +49. Do you have strong feelings about damage awards in lawsuits? Do you believe that damages should be capped at a certain level in litigation? 
-49. Do you have strong feelings about damage awards in lawsuits? Do you + 
-believe that damages should be capped at a certain level in litigation?+<-- 
 +\\ 
 + 
 +=== What Lies Behind the Questions? === 
 + 
 +As noted by Gershen-Siegel in Semantic Shenanigans, while most of the questions are standard for jury selection, some jumped out at her: 
 +  * Whether the prospective juror might be biased against large corporations like the plaintiffs in favor of "the little guy." 
 +  * Prospective jurors' reading and listening habits with regard to the entertainment industry, technology, science fiction and Star Trek. 
 + 
 +She wrote: 
 + 
 +> Hence as might be expected, plaintiffs need to concern themselves with potential jurors who might ignore the facts and instead seek their own brand of ‘justice’ (an issue for either side, I might add). \\ \\ Furthermore, that means our [Semantic Shenanigans podcast] listeners and listeners to the G&T Show, and … readers of blogs like Fan Film Factor, AxaMonitor, Trek Geeks, etc. would be challenged. And this would not surprise me.(([[http://www.semanticshenanigans.com/axanar-pretrial-voir-dire-lcs-petition/|"Axanar Pretrial Voir Dire and LCS Petition," SemanticShenanigans.com]], Janet Gershen-Siegel, 12/31/16.)) {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}} 
 + 
 +---- 
 +**Keywords** {{tag>Plaintiffs Defendants Lawsuit Jury}}