Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
tardigrades_third_complaint [2019/01/18 22:00] – updates headlines Carlos Pedrazatardigrades_third_complaint [2019/02/03 23:21] – [Copyright Lawsuit Names Discovery Writer as Possible Link] Carlos Pedraza
Line 27: Line 27:
 The complaint now numbers 23 pages, plus attachments, as opposed to the 15 pages of the second amended complaint. The amended complaint elaborated further on the original allegations but also withdrew a number of key claims upon which Abdin previously relied. The complaint now numbers 23 pages, plus attachments, as opposed to the 15 pages of the second amended complaint. The amended complaint elaborated further on the original allegations but also withdrew a number of key claims upon which Abdin previously relied.
  
-[{{ :anas_abdin_twitter_avi.jpg?100|Plaintiff **Anas Abdin**}}]+[{{ ::anas_abdin_linkedin.jpg?150|Plaintiff **Anas Abdin** <fs smaller>/LinkedIn</fs>}}]
  
 <WRAP center 90%> <WRAP center 90%>
Line 37: Line 37:
 One of the key elements in proving copyright infringement is establishing the defendant had seen the copyrighted material. Lawyers for CBS and Netflix had previously criticized Abdin’s ”bare and speculative allegations“ that any of the defendants had the access to actually copy Abdin’s work. To establish access Abdin must “plausibly allege either: (1) a particular chain of events or a link from his work to the creators of the allegedly infringing work, or (2) that plaintiff’s work was widely disseminated.”((Abdin v. CBS Broadcasting Inc. et al., Docket 34, p. 4, 12/03/18.)) One of the key elements in proving copyright infringement is establishing the defendant had seen the copyrighted material. Lawyers for CBS and Netflix had previously criticized Abdin’s ”bare and speculative allegations“ that any of the defendants had the access to actually copy Abdin’s work. To establish access Abdin must “plausibly allege either: (1) a particular chain of events or a link from his work to the creators of the allegedly infringing work, or (2) that plaintiff’s work was widely disseminated.”((Abdin v. CBS Broadcasting Inc. et al., Docket 34, p. 4, 12/03/18.))
  
-In a January 8 [[tardigrades_steam|pre-motion conference]], the judge gave Abdin's lawyers until March 19 to find evidence Discovery's creators had in fact accessed the Tardigrades game on the videogame platform [[https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=344701010|Steam Greenlight]], a platform in which Steam members can vote in favor of proposed new games to be added for sale on the platform.+In a January 8 [[tardigrades_steam|pre-motion conference]], the judge gave Abdin's lawyers until March 19 to find evidence Discovery's creators had in fact accessed the Tardigrades game on the videogame platform [[https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=344701010|Steam Greenlight]], a platform on which Steam members can vote in favor of proposed new games to be added for sale on the platform.
  
 ==== Star Trek Games on Steam ==== ==== Star Trek Games on Steam ====