Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
summary_opposition [2016/12/06 21:18] – created Carlos Pedraza | summary_opposition [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
These new briefs were the second step in the process by each side to seek a [[summary judgment]] from [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]] that began November 16. | These new briefs were the second step in the process by each side to seek a [[summary judgment]] from [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]] that began November 16. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{page> | ||
In the opposition documents, each side submitted new documents and evidence to bolster its claims, as well as objections to previously submitted evidence by opposing counsel in the case. The defense, for example, objected to testimony from the deposition of CBS senior vice president [[cbs_officials|John Van Citters]]. | In the opposition documents, each side submitted new documents and evidence to bolster its claims, as well as objections to previously submitted evidence by opposing counsel in the case. The defense, for example, objected to testimony from the deposition of CBS senior vice president [[cbs_officials|John Van Citters]]. | ||
- | [{{ :: | + | [{{ :: |
The plaintiffs, for their part, moved to have Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane, who covers fan productions for his blog, Fan Film Factor, disqualified as an expert witness, with his testimony consisting of hearsay. | The plaintiffs, for their part, moved to have Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane, who covers fan productions for his blog, Fan Film Factor, disqualified as an expert witness, with his testimony consisting of hearsay. | ||
Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
As part of that effort, each side filed what are called evidentiary objections — an attempt to get the judge to disallow certain evidence as irrelevant or inadmissible. | As part of that effort, each side filed what are called evidentiary objections — an attempt to get the judge to disallow certain evidence as irrelevant or inadmissible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Defendants' | ||
+ | {!stub: | ||
<WRAP right round alert 50%> | <WRAP right round alert 50%> | ||
<wrap lo> | <wrap lo> | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | |||
- | === Defendants' | ||
- | {!stub: | ||
=== Plaintiffs' | === Plaintiffs' | ||
Line 137: | Line 139: | ||
The next step in the summary judgment process requires each side to file a reply by December 5 to the opposition briefs submitted November 28. That will be followed by a hearing before Judge Klausner scheduled for December 19. He will rule after that. | The next step in the summary judgment process requires each side to file a reply by December 5 to the opposition briefs submitted November 28. That will be followed by a hearing before Judge Klausner scheduled for December 19. He will rule after that. | ||
- | In the meantime, the case continues | + | In the meantime, the case continued |
---- | ---- | ||
- | **Keywords** {{tag> | + | **Keywords** {{tag> |