Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
settlement_conference [2016/11/05 00:07] – updates w/friday phone call and aftermath. Carlos Pedraza | settlement_conference [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
- | ====== Conference Call Follow Up on Settlement Talks ====== | ||
- | **//Peters Says Settlement | + | ====== Axanar |
+ | |||
+ | //**Axanar Surrogate Reveals Defense Plans to File Motion**// | ||
{{TOC}} | {{TOC}} | ||
< | < | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | Attorneys | + | <wrap lo>//See also: [[summary_judgment|Motions |
- | Earlier in the week, [[federal_magistrate_judge_charles_f._eick|Federal magistrate Judge Charles Eick]] led a meeting between plaintiffs | + | <wrap em> |
- | Eick's conference call included only the attorneys for both sides. | + | It became clear the defense planned to submit such a motion, which asks a judge to rule on the case on the merits, avoiding a time and expense of a jury trial. |
- | ===== After the Conference Call ===== | + | That news came from the Fan Film Factor blog, written by Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane, in which he revealed the defense would seek summary judgment from federal [[judge_r._gary_klausner|Judge R. Gary Klausner]].(([[http:// |
- | It wasn' | + | A settlement didn' |
- | If the two sides were unable to reach a resolution, observers aren't likely to know about it until some other court filing. | + | The call two days before the deadline |
- | ===== ‘Close’ to Settlement ===== | + | After the first meeting, Peters appeared to make non-negotiable a demand that eventual settlement terms had to offer him the opportunity to satisfy donors by producing some form of // |
+ | |||
+ | ===== Attending the Meetings ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[federal_magistrate_judge_charles_f._eick|Federal magistrate Judge Charles Eick]] led a face-to-face meeting between plaintiffs [[CBS]] and [[paramount_pictures|Paramount]], | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | The follow-up November 4 conference call included only Eick and the attorneys for both sides in off-the-record conversations((Civil Minutes, Settlement Conference Call, Charles F. Eick, United States Magistrate Judge, 11/4/16.)) intended to find some way to avoid taking the case through the time and expense of a trial currently scheduled to begin January 31, 2017. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lead plaintiffs' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Non-Negotiable Point ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In his statement after the first conference call, Peters said negotiations would continue but had appeared to make little headway on his non-negotiable point, and that he remained prepared to go to trial: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | > Axanar Productions remains in negotiations to achieve a settlement with plaintiffs (CBS Studios and Paramount Pictures Corporation). \\ \\ As we’ve stated from the beginning of this legal odyssey, we are willing to addresses the concerns plaintiffs raised with regard to the production of our Star Trek fan film <wrap hi>as long as we are allowed to make sure the story of Garth of Izar, the Battle of Axanar and the Four Years’ War can be told in a way that meets the expectations set for thousands of fans and donors</ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Filing for Summary Judgment ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | If the two sides proved unable to reach a resolution, observers aren't likely to know about it until some other court filing. The next deadline in the case is November 16, by which date motions, particularly for [[wp> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Was Close to Settlement ===== | ||
Peters reported after the first meeting that the two sides "are close" to a settlement but cautioned Axanar fans to " | Peters reported after the first meeting that the two sides "are close" to a settlement but cautioned Axanar fans to " | ||
Line 33: | Line 59: | ||
===== Settlement Conference ===== | ===== Settlement Conference ===== | ||
- | Federal | + | In May, federal |
<WRAP right round download 50%> | <WRAP right round download 50%> | ||
- | **DOWNLOAD** magistrate Judge Eick's [[driv> | + | <wrap lo>**DOWNLOAD** magistrate Judge Eick's [[driv> |
</ | </ | ||
==== Earlier Discovery Motions ==== | ==== Earlier Discovery Motions ==== | ||
Line 50: | Line 76: | ||
===== Terms of the Order ===== | ===== Terms of the Order ===== | ||
- | Eick's order for the conference | + | Eick's order for the face-to-face meeting |
* Both sides to have representatives with the legal authority to agree to a settlement without having to consult with a superior. | * Both sides to have representatives with the legal authority to agree to a settlement without having to consult with a superior. | ||
Line 57: | Line 83: | ||
* Attorneys for both sides to have explored the parameters of settlement with their clients well in advance of the settlement conference. | * Attorneys for both sides to have explored the parameters of settlement with their clients well in advance of the settlement conference. | ||
- | {{page> | + | It is not known if the follow-up conference calls required similarly authorized individuals to be present. |
+ | {{page> | ||
==== Private, Informal Conversations ==== | ==== Private, Informal Conversations ==== | ||
Line 73: | Line 100: | ||
* Fully itemized damages. | * Fully itemized damages. | ||
- | The studios | + | The studios |
=== Damages === | === Damages === |