Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
settlement_conference [2016/11/14 02:04] – edits subhead Carlos Pedraza | settlement_conference [2016/11/16 17:12] – Updates with talks fizzling, summary judgement proceeding Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
- | ====== | + | ====== Axanar |
- | //**Monday' | + | //**Axanar Surrogate Reveals Defense Plans to File Motion**// |
{{TOC}} | {{TOC}} | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | <wrap em> | + | <wrap em> |
- | Negotiations continued even after a statement | + | It became clear the defense planned to submit such a motion, which asks a judge to rule on the case on the merits, avoiding a time and expense of a jury trial. |
+ | |||
+ | That news came from the Fan Film Factor blog, written | ||
+ | |||
+ | A settlement didn't appear imminent after a federal magistrate failed to file minutes from a November 14 settlement conference call that was to have taken place. That raised questions about whether the meeting even happened, and if was related to the deadline for filing motions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The call two days before the deadline would have been the fourth court-mandated settlement conference between lawyers for Axanar | ||
+ | |||
+ | After the first meeting, Peters | ||
===== Attending the Meetings ===== | ===== Attending the Meetings ===== | ||
Line 49: | Line 57: | ||
===== Settlement Conference ===== | ===== Settlement Conference ===== | ||
- | Federal | + | In May, federal |
<WRAP right round download 50%> | <WRAP right round download 50%> |