Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
second_letter [2019/04/16 01:05] – Carlos Pedraza | second_letter [2019/04/22 00:11] (current) – Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | [splash image]\\ | + | {{: |
- | <fs smaller>[cutline]</fs> <fs x-small>// | + | |
- | <fs x-small> | + | <fs x-small> |
- | ====== | + | ====== |
- | **//Big talk, little action | + | **//Big talk, little action: Is Alec Peters |
| | ||
- | **Unrelenting, | + | **Unrelenting, |
- | {{page>see also}}{{page>subscribe}} | + | <WRAP center 90%> <fs smaller> |
+ | See also: [[: | ||
- | ===== [Headline 2] ===== | + | ===== No Reply From Peters' |
- | * **AxaMonitor has a copy** | + | In an April 12, 2019, letter to Peters’ attorney of record in Georgia, Beverly Hills attorney Torin A. Dorros wondered why he hasn’t heard back in a month and a half about Dorros’ offer to negotiate an end to a public dispute that has aired [[:peters_sues_burnett#bitter_exchanges|Axanar' |
- | * **In a minute-long rant** | + | |
- | —- | + | |
- | “You wanna steal money, you wanna steal equipment, you wanna deny us our assets, I’m taking you to court. … Rob Burnett is a thief. It’s that simple.” | + | {{page> |
+ | |||
+ | Apparently concerned by Peters’ lack of legal experience, and Peters’ insistence on communicating with him, Dorros pleaded for intervention by Peters’ attorney, H. Michael Dever: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > I have not received any response from you to my prior correspondences. I would thus respectfully request a response as to whether I should be handling this matter through you or directly with Mr. Peters — I do believe <wrap hi>it would be to the parties’ benefit to have experienced counsel such as yourself involved</ | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right round download 320px> {{ : | ||
+ | <fs small> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Lawyer: Stop Defaming Burnett ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **AxaMonitor** obtained a copy of the three-page April 12 letter in which Dorros [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | During a minute-plus rant during the [[yout> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros warned Dever’s client off such behavior: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > I will not go into detail as to the various and multiple [[yout> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ : | ||
+ | ===== Big Talk, Little Action ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Despite Peters’ legal threats and his repeated denigration of Burnett over the past five months, the lawsuit has essentially sputtered to a halt. Again. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Delays ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | After filing suit in Georgia state court in Gwinnett County on February 18: <WRAP 90% center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **First delay**: It took Peters 25 days to serve Burnett, a California resident with the legal summons for the Georgia lawsuit. | ||
+ | * **Badly served**: Neither Peters nor his attorney have filed the required proof of service with the court. Without such proof filed with the court, Burnett isn’t required to reply to the suit, effectively grinding Peters’ legal action to a halt. According to Dorros: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > While indeed Mr. Burnett appears to have been served with papers in the action — this should not be taken as a concession as to whether such service in fact is proper or sufficient and thus for the moment our position is that service is improper and/or insufficient.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Under [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Peters’ lawyer MIA**: According to Gwinnett County [[https:// | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Burnett' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Asked to comment on the pubic release of his attorney’s letter, Burnett said, "As you know, I’m taking all of this very, very seriously. So, on the advice of counsel, I cannot comment on any ongoing, or upcoming, legal proceedings involving these cases." | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Big Talk ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | More documents obtained by AxaMonitor cast doubt on Peters’ stated intentions to pursue Burnett for more than $45,000 in damages, largely stemming from $30,000 paid to Burnett that Peters now says were loans for which he wants to be repaid. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | In an email to Dorros attempting to persuade him to accept his [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Trying to Settle ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Despite [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros observed Peters’ true goal in a March 4 email appeared to be regaining the lost // | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{youtube> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <fs small> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | **The latest salvo**: Dorros’ letter is the most recent chapter in what can only be described as Peters’ **sputtering lawsuit** | + | </ |
- | < | + | However, Dorros argued the terms of Peters’ proposal "do not in fact read that way": |
- | * **Big talk, little action**: More documents obtained by AxaMonitor cast doubt on Peters’ | + | > In my opinion, [Peters’ |
- | * **Peters | + | |
- | **Stalling tactics?** | + | Peters scoffed at Dorros: |
+ | |||
+ | > If you aren’t smart enough to take the very generous settlement offer we sent, then see you in court. I am tired of your absurd bullshit.((Alec Peters email to Torin Dorros, re: Final Settlement Offer, 3/3/19.)) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Missing Plaintiff === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros’ letter also observed Peters’ settlement proposal did not include the other plaintiff in the suit, Axanar Productions Inc. "It would need to be a party to the settlement agreement," | ||
+ | |||
+ | Despite being named a defendant in the suit against Burnett, Axanar Productions Inc. may not have standing to sue in Georgia courts. It remains a California corporation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Digital Assets ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros’ devoted most of his letter to the digital assets (e.g., visual effects, footage, artwork and more) Peters | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Missing screenshots** | ||
+ | * **Already in possession?** | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Moreover, Dorros criticized the scope of Peters demand for materials Burnett is to turn over: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > The definition or scope of alleged digital assets demanded | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros asked for a detailed list of items, within seven days, to which Peters believes he’s entitled. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ :: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== About Burnett's Attorney ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros represents clients in privacy and data breach, complex commercial and intellectual property litigation, especially focusing on healthcare, entertainment and media, social media and the Internet, software, and technology industries.(([[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== A Prelude Fan ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dorros admitted he was a fan of //Prelude to Axanar//, and that he hoped Peters would direct | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP tip 90%> <wrap em> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
- | | + | **Keywords**} |
- | * **No reply**: Dorros also criticizes the lack of response by Dever to his [[: | + | |
- | * **Peters’ lawyer MIA? | + | |
- | * **‘Experienced counsel’**: | + | |
- | * **Mixed message**: Dorros’ letter also strikes a conciliatory tone offering to negotiate return of Axanar’s so-called digital assets (e.g., visual effects, footage, artwork and more) retained by Burnett. But Peters’ demand fails to include his promised screenshots of three hard drives detailing the assets he // | + | |
- | * **Already in possession? | + | |
- | * **Seven days**: Dorros asks Peters’ lawyer to provide the information necessary for Burnett to even begin to identify what Peters is looking for. | + | |
- | {{page> | + | |
+ | {{tag> | ||