Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
peters_judgment [2019/05/16 16:38] – Carlos Pedrazapeters_judgment [2019/05/17 12:08] (current) – [Why it Matters] Carlos Pedraza
Line 12: Line 12:
 **A defamation lawsuit** long-forgotten by [[Axanar]] producer [[Alec Peters]] is coming back to haunt him in a new move by his legal opponent in the [[:hero_prop_suit|Nevada lawsuit]] over the sale of the Enterprise-E model. **A defamation lawsuit** long-forgotten by [[Axanar]] producer [[Alec Peters]] is coming back to haunt him in a new move by his legal opponent in the [[:hero_prop_suit|Nevada lawsuit]] over the sale of the Enterprise-E model.
  
-{{page>see also}}{{page>subscribe}} +<WRAP center 90%> <fs smaller>**//See also: [[hero_prop_suit|Trial in Peters' Prop Sale, Defamation Lawsuit Due in 2020]]//** </fs> </WRAP> 
-See also: [[:hero_prop_suit|]]+ 
 +{{page>subscribe}}
  
 ===== Unpaid Legal Judgment ===== ===== Unpaid Legal Judgment =====
Line 20: Line 21:
  
 ==== Jason DeBord ==== ==== Jason DeBord ====
 +
 +[{{ ::jason_debord-linkedin.jpg|**Jason DeBord** <fs x-small>LinkedIn</fs>}}]
  
 Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx. Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx.
 ---- ----
-<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBoard, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP>+<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBord, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP> 
 + 
 +<WRAP right round download 320px> 
 +{{ ::small_debord.jpg?85|}} 
 +<fs smaller>**DOWNLOAD** the legal documents filed in Nevada district court assigning Alec Peters' unpaid judgment, for losing his defamation suit against blogger Jason DeBord, to his newest legal opponent, Tiana Anderson and her company, Hero Prop. \\ {{ ::debord_judgment.pdf |800K PDF}}</fs> 
 +</WRAP>
  
 ==== Case Thrown Out ==== ==== Case Thrown Out ====
Line 36: Line 44:
  
 The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters. The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters.
 +
 +[{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}]
  
 ===== Why it Matters ===== ===== Why it Matters =====
Line 43: Line 53:
   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.
   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.
-  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors — including the attorney who represented him in the lost case against DeBord. +  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors — including the attorney who represented him in the lost case against DeBord. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-{{page>footer}}{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters Propworx props Hero_Prop}}+<WRAP tip 90%> 
 +<wrap em>COMMENT & SHARE</wrap> \\ 
 +<wrap lo>Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/633798010468383/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]] or share on:</wrap>~~socialite~~ 
 +</WRAP> 
 +---- 
 +**Keywords**{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters Propworx props Hero_Prop}}