Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
peters_judgment [2019/05/16 15:55] – Carlos Pedrazapeters_judgment [2019/05/17 12:08] (current) – [Why it Matters] Carlos Pedraza
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== <font 10px -webkit-text-stroke-width:0px text-align:left/arial, ;;#555353;;inherit>Original image/Propworx</font> \\ +{{::propworx_judgment-2-1.jpg|}} 
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The cover of a lavish auction catalog published by Alec Peters’ Propworx company for 2010 Star Trek prop and costume auction — the same year as his ill-fated defamation suit against a critical blogger.</font>+<fs smaller>**BACK IN THE DAY** The cover of a lavish auction catalog published by Alec Peters’ Propworx company for a major 2010 Star Trek prop and costume auction — the same year as his ill-fated defamation suit against a critical blogger.</fs> <fs x-small>Original image/Propworx</fs> 
  
-======   ======+<fs x-small>MAY 16, 2019<wrap indent> | </wrap><wrap indent> 3 MIN READ</wrap></fs>
  
-====== Hero Prop Makes Tactical Legal Move in Suit against Alec Peters and Propworx ======+====== Hero Prop Makes Tactical Legal Move Against Alec Peters ======
  
-**A defamation lawsuit** long-forgotten by Axanar producer Alec Peters is coming back to haunt him in a new move by his legal opponent in the [[:hero_prop_suit|Nevada lawsuit]] over the sale of the Enterprise-E model.+**//Prop company owner buys unpaid legal judgment in Peters' failed 2010 defamation case// **
  
-See also: [[:hero_prop_suit|]]+{{TOC}}{{page>byline}}
  
-  * **The plaintiff in the Nevada suit**, Tiana Armstrong, is going after at least $13,000 in damages Peters owes but has never paid to a blogger who criticized his business practices. +**A defamation lawsuit** long-forgotten by [[Axanar]] producer [[Alec Peters]] is coming back to haunt him in a new move by his legal opponent in the [[:hero_prop_suit|Nevada lawsuit]] over the sale of the Enterprise-E model. 
-  * **Peters sued Jason DeBord**  in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company. + 
-  * **Case thrown out**: That case was [[:hero_prop_suit#previous_defamation_suit|thrown out]] after a judge found it was intended to stifle DeBord’s [[http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/anti-slapp-law-california|right to free speech]]. +<WRAP center 90%> <fs smaller>**//See also: [[hero_prop_suit|Trial in Peters' Prop Sale, Defamation Lawsuit Due in 2020]]//** </fs> </WRAP> 
-  * **Peters never paid**  the $26,000 in attorney’s fees and court costs to DeBord and the blog (co-defendants). DeBord was personally owed $13,000. + 
-  * **Purchased judgment**: According to court documents filed in Nevada, Armstrong purchased DeBord’s personal judgment, making him whole eight years since Peters’ lawsuit was struck. (We’ll make the documents available on AxaMonitor.com) +{{page>subscribe}} 
-  * **Pursuing payment**. The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters. + 
-**Why it matters**: Contacted by AxaMonitor, Armstrong would not comment on why she purchased DeBord’s judgment. But a few possibilities emerge:+===== Unpaid Legal Judgment ===== 
 + 
 +The plaintiff in the Nevada [[hero_prop_suit|Hero Prop suit]], Tiana Armstrong, is going after at least $13,000 in damages Peters owes but has never paid to a blogger who criticized his business practices. That's on top of the damages she seeks in Nevada suit. 
 + 
 +==== Jason DeBord ==== 
 + 
 +[{{ ::jason_debord-linkedin.jpg|**Jason DeBord** <fs x-small>LinkedIn</fs>}}] 
 + 
 +Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx. 
 +---- 
 +<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBord, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP> 
 + 
 +<WRAP right round download 320px> 
 +{{ ::small_debord.jpg?85|}} 
 +<fs smaller>**DOWNLOAD** the legal documents filed in Nevada district court assigning Alec Peters' unpaid judgment, for losing his defamation suit against blogger Jason DeBord, to his newest legal opponent, Tiana Anderson and her company, Hero Prop. \\ {{ ::debord_judgment.pdf |800K PDF}}</fs> 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +==== Case Thrown Out ==== 
 + 
 +That case was [[:hero_prop_suit#previous_defamation_suit|thrown out]] after a California judge found it was intended to stifle DeBord’s [[http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/anti-slapp-law-california|right to free speech]]. 
 + 
 +Peters never paid the $26,000 in attorney’s fees and court costs to DeBord and the blog (both co-defendants). DeBord was personally owed $13,000. 
 + 
 +===== Pursuing Payment ===== 
 + 
 +According to court documents filed in Nevada, Armstrong purchased DeBord’s personal judgment, making him whole eight years since Peters’ lawsuit was struck. 
 + 
 +The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters. 
 + 
 +[{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}] 
 + 
 +===== Why it Matters ===== 
 + 
 +Contacted by AxaMonitor, Armstrong would not comment on why she purchased DeBord’s judgment. But a few possibilities emerged: 
 +<WRAP center 90%>
   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.
   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.
-  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors, including his attorney in the lost case against DeBord. +  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors — including the attorney who represented him in the lost case against DeBord. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}} 
 +</WRAP>
  
 +<WRAP tip 90%>
 +<wrap em>COMMENT & SHARE</wrap> \\
 +<wrap lo>Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/633798010468383/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]] or share on:</wrap>~~socialite~~
 +</WRAP>
 +----
 +**Keywords**{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters Propworx props Hero_Prop}}