Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
peters_judgment [2019/05/16 17:20] – Carlos Pedrazapeters_judgment [2019/05/17 12:08] (current) – [Why it Matters] Carlos Pedraza
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 ==== Jason DeBord ==== ==== Jason DeBord ====
 +
 +[{{ ::jason_debord-linkedin.jpg|**Jason DeBord** <fs x-small>LinkedIn</fs>}}]
  
 Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx. Peters sued blogger Jason DeBord in 2010, claiming DeBord’s [[http://www.originalprop.com/blog/|Original Prop Blog]] had published defamatory articles about Peters and his company, Propworx.
 ---- ----
-<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBoard, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP>+<WRAP>//**__« <fs smaller>I hereby further verify … the entire amount of $13,640 is unpaid [by Peters], due and owing, plus court costs and interest accrued at 10 percent per annum.</fs> »__ **//  <wrap indent>//— Defendant Jason DeBord, assigning his judgment for collection by Peters' newest legal opponent//</wrap></WRAP>
  
 <WRAP right round download 320px> <WRAP right round download 320px>
Line 43: Line 45:
 The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters. The court documents also show that Armstrong is seeking to get a Georgia court to allow her to pursue the DeBord judgment directly from Peters.
  
-{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}+[{{ :alec_peters.jpg?150|**Alec Peters**}}]
  
 ===== Why it Matters ===== ===== Why it Matters =====
Line 51: Line 53:
   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.   * **Swaying the judge**: Hero Prop’s suit will be decided by a judge, Armstrong having waived a jury trial.
   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.   * **Who owes whom**: The judgment allows Armstrong to demonstrate going into trial that Peters owes her thousands of dollars.
-  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors — including the attorney who represented him in the lost case against DeBord. +  * **Forcing payment**: Once the California judgment is allowed to be pursued against Peters in Georgia, he’ll either have to pay it to resolve the long-ignored damages or let Armstrong use his non-payment at trial, and possibly to spotlight the [[:sphinxcon#finishing_the_bridge_set|hundreds of thousands of dollars]] Peters and Propworx owe many creditors — including the attorney who represented him in the lost case against DeBord. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-{{page>footer}}{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters Propworx props Hero_Prop}}+<WRAP tip 90%> 
 +<wrap em>COMMENT & SHARE</wrap> \\ 
 +<wrap lo>Discuss this article in [[face>groups/axamonitor/permalink/633798010468383/|AxaMonitor's Facebook group]] or share on:</wrap>~~socialite~~ 
 +</WRAP> 
 +---- 
 +**Keywords**{{tag>lawsuit legal Alec_Peters Propworx props Hero_Prop}}