Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
mudds [2018/09/26 15:18] – created Carlos Pedraza | mudds [2021/10/10 11:40] – Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <fs x-small> | ||
+ | |||
====== AxaMonitor' | ====== AxaMonitor' | ||
- | /* | + | {{TOC}} |
+ | {{page> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We decided to follow the example of the Washington Post in using a simple graphic to depict our assessment of how factual statements made by people covered by **AxaMonitor** are. | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
- | fades | ||
- | <WRAP right info 50%> | + | Like the Post's " |
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right info round 320px> | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
<wrap lo> | <wrap lo> | ||
Line 15: | Line 24: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ==== Meet Harcourt Fenton Mudd ==== | + | ===== Meet Harcourt Fenton Mudd ===== |
- | Harry, for short. One of the most popular | + | Mudd, for short. One of the most popular |
- | He's a lying, thieving, self-aggrandizing, | + | He's a lying, thieving, self-aggrandizing, |
- | ==== Muddying the Truth ==== | + | ===== Muddying the Truth ===== |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | {{::mudd.png?nolink |}}{{:: | + | <WRAP right round important 320px> |
+ | {{::axamonitor_daily_banner.jpg|}} | ||
+ | <wrap lo><wrap em>SIGN UP</ | ||
+ | </WRAP> | ||
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | Statements and claims that contain “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” will be recognized with our prized Spock Science Insignia. We tend to reserve this for claims that are unexpectedly true, so it is not awarded very often. | ||
- | <fs 24px> | + | {{: |
- | {{:: | + | {{:: |
- | ==== Recidivism Watch ==== | + | ==== Re-offenders |
- | + | ||
- | Finally, we also have a feature called “Recidivism Watch,” which highlights claims repeated by politicians even though the claim has been previously debunked. | + | |
+ | {{:: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== Debate and Criticism ==== | + | <WRAP right round info 320px> |
- | + | ||
- | All judgments are subject to debate and criticism from our readers and interested parties, and can be revised if fresh evidence emerges. We invite you to join the discussion on these pages and contact the Fact Checker directly with tips, suggestions, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | <WRAP right round info 50%> | + | |
<wrap lo> | <wrap lo> | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ==== Additional Facts to Contribute | + | ===== Debate, Criticism and Additional Facts ===== |
- | If you have facts or documents that shed more light on the subject under discussion, or if you think we have made a mistake, please let us know. We also want to make sure that the authors of questionable claims have ample opportunity to argue their case. We issue our own ruling on factual disputes (see our rules on the “Pinocchio Test” below) but it can be revised and updated if fresh evidence emerges. Our view is that a fact check is never really finished, so the rating can be revised after we obtain new information that changes the factual basis for our original ruling. */ | + | We'll look to revise any judgments if new evidence emerges, and we encourage feedback from readers |
+ | |||
+ | Think we're being unfair? Let us know; we're happy to discuss | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP tip 75%> | ||
+ | <wrap em> | ||
+ | Discuss this article in [[face> | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | **Keywords** {{tag> |