no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Previous revisionNext revision | |||
— | mudds [2019/03/08 18:37] – Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | ====== AxaMonitor' | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{page> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We're following the example of the Washington Post in using a simple graphic to depict our assessment of the factualness of statements made by people covered by **AxaMonitor**. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Like the Post's " | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right info 50%> | ||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | <wrap lo> | ||
+ | "Come now." \\ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | "Liar and rogue." | ||
+ | "Did I leave you with that impression?" | ||
+ | <wrap indent lo>— //James T. Kirk and Harry Mudd, 2268 ("I, Mudd" | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Meet Harcourt Fenton Mudd ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mudd, for short. One of the most popular antagonists of Star Trek's original series, the character was even revived on The Animated Series and more recently on //Star Trek: Discovery// | ||
+ | |||
+ | He's a lying, thieving, self-aggrandizing, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Muddying the Truth ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{page> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <fs 24px> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Recidivism Watch ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, we also have a feature called “Recidivism Watch,” which highlights claims repeated by politicians even though the claim has been previously debunked. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Debate and Criticism ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | All judgments are subject to debate and criticism from our readers and interested parties, and can be revised if fresh evidence emerges. We invite you to join the discussion on these pages and contact the Fact Checker directly with tips, suggestions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right round info 50%> | ||
+ | <wrap lo> | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Additional Facts to Contribute ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you have facts or documents that shed more light on the subject under discussion, or if you think we have made a mistake, please let us know. We also want to make sure that the authors of questionable claims have ample opportunity to argue their case. We issue our own ruling on factual disputes (see our rules on the “Pinocchio Test” below) but it can be revised and updated if fresh evidence emerges. Our view is that a fact check is never really finished, so the rating can be revised after we obtain new information that changes the factual basis for our original ruling. |