Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
motion_to_dismiss [2016/07/11 13:27] – [Motions to Dismiss] correx time Carlos Pedrazamotion_to_dismiss [2016/07/23 14:34] – [Filtering Out] correx Lizerbram spelling Carlos Pedraza
Line 139: Line 139:
 </WRAP>  </WRAP> 
  
-However, the Lizerbraum Law Blog thinks arguments reducing the Star Trek copyright to the costumes, words and minor characters is missing the forest for the trees:+However, the Lizerbram Law Blog thinks arguments reducing the Star Trek copyright to the costumes, words and minor characters is missing the forest for the trees:
  
 > Unfortunately for Axanar, it’s unlikely that this argument will be successful. Based on a brief review of //Prelude to Axanar//, <wrap hi>it’s clear that the costumes, sets, makeup, and spaceship design are all intended to suggest that they’re part of the Star Trek universe.</wrap>(([[http://lizerbramlaw.com/2016/02/25/can-you-create-your-own-star-trek-movie/|Lizerbram Law Blog: Copyright Case: Can You Create Your Own Star Trek Movie?]], 2/25/16.)) <wrap lo>[emphasis added]</wrap> > Unfortunately for Axanar, it’s unlikely that this argument will be successful. Based on a brief review of //Prelude to Axanar//, <wrap hi>it’s clear that the costumes, sets, makeup, and spaceship design are all intended to suggest that they’re part of the Star Trek universe.</wrap>(([[http://lizerbramlaw.com/2016/02/25/can-you-create-your-own-star-trek-movie/|Lizerbram Law Blog: Copyright Case: Can You Create Your Own Star Trek Movie?]], 2/25/16.)) <wrap lo>[emphasis added]</wrap>