Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
fanfilm_report [2016/09/01 01:07] – punctuation fix Carlos Pedrazafanfilm_report [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 6: Line 6:
 ====== Axanar Supporters’ Report Critiques Fan Film Guidelines ====== ====== Axanar Supporters’ Report Critiques Fan Film Guidelines ======
 {{TOC}} {{TOC}}
 +
 +<WRAP>
 +//**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]]**</wrap>
 +</WRAP>
  
 A group calling for a partial boycott of //Star Trek: Discovery// has submitted a report to CBS criticizing its [[cbs_guidelines|fan film guidelines]] and calling for the studio to make specific changes. A group calling for a partial boycott of //Star Trek: Discovery// has submitted a report to CBS criticizing its [[cbs_guidelines|fan film guidelines]] and calling for the studio to make specific changes.
Line 64: Line 68:
 ===== Examining Each Guideline ===== ===== Examining Each Guideline =====
  
-The collapsed headings below open to an examination of each guideline, the report's specific recommendations and **AxaMonitor**'s analysis of those recommendations.+//The collapsed headings below open to an examination of each guideline, the report's specific recommendations and **AxaMonitor**'s analysis of those recommendations.//
  
 --> Guideline 1: Run Time Limits, No Series# --> Guideline 1: Run Time Limits, No Series#
Line 110: Line 114:
 After initially assuming the purpose of this guideline was to force productions to purchase expensive uniforms, accessories and other items, rather than allowing fans to construct their own, Van Citters' explanation in the Engage podcast made the guideline more palatable to respondents. Even so, the report recommended this revision: \\ \\ After initially assuming the purpose of this guideline was to force productions to purchase expensive uniforms, accessories and other items, rather than allowing fans to construct their own, Van Citters' explanation in the Engage podcast made the guideline more palatable to respondents. Even so, the report recommended this revision: \\ \\
 > <wrap lo>A fan production is welcome to create their own Star Trek uniforms, accessories, and props from scratch and even pay to have these items custom made. However, if such items are purchased from a commercial manufacturer or seller, such items must be official merchandise and not bootleg items or imitations of such commercially available products.</wrap> \\ > <wrap lo>A fan production is welcome to create their own Star Trek uniforms, accessories, and props from scratch and even pay to have these items custom made. However, if such items are purchased from a commercial manufacturer or seller, such items must be official merchandise and not bootleg items or imitations of such commercially available products.</wrap> \\
-**ANALYSIS** While the report seems to indicate general acceptability of this guideline once it was [[guidelines-podcast#questions and answers|clarified]] by Van Citters, the proposed revision creates a potential problem by allowing productions to pay to have items custom made. Isn't paying someone to create such products when that person has no license the same thing as buying bootleg merchandise. While Van Citters' clarification allows production to construct their own items, it remains unclear how CBS would enforce this principle with its planned "no micromanagement" approach.+**ANALYSIS** While the report seems to indicate general acceptability of this guideline once it was [[guidelines-podcast#questions and answers|clarified]] by Van Citters, the proposed revision creates a potential problem by allowing productions to pay to have items custom made. Isn't paying someone to create such products when that person has no license the same thing as buying bootleg merchandise? While Van Citters' clarification allows production to construct their own items, it remains unclear how CBS would enforce this principle with its planned "no micromanagement" approach.
  
 <-- <--