Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
excluding_evidence [2017/01/06 17:14] – layout fix Carlos Pedrazaexcluding_evidence [2017/01/12 00:25] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 11: Line 11:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-<wrap lo>//See also: [[summary_fact_check|Peters' Personal Spending Spurs Axanar Accounting]]//</wrap>+<wrap lo>See also: //[[order_exclude_evidence|Judge Rules on Excluding Evidence]]// and //[[summary_fact_check|Peters' Personal Spending Spurs Axanar Accounting]]//</wrap>
  
 Attorneys filed motions December 16, 2016, seeking to exclude evidence from Axanar’s upcoming copyright infringement trial. The defense, as expected, challenged the admissibility of defendant [[Alec Peters]]’ damning financial records,  and sought to disallow testimony from //Prelude// director [[gossett-subpoena|Christian Gossett]] and former chief technologist [[terry_mcintosh|Terry McIntosh]], citing their "personal drama" and "smear campaign" against Peters. Attorneys filed motions December 16, 2016, seeking to exclude evidence from Axanar’s upcoming copyright infringement trial. The defense, as expected, challenged the admissibility of defendant [[Alec Peters]]’ damning financial records,  and sought to disallow testimony from //Prelude// director [[gossett-subpoena|Christian Gossett]] and former chief technologist [[terry_mcintosh|Terry McIntosh]], citing their "personal drama" and "smear campaign" against Peters.
Line 38: Line 38:
   * **EXPERT MEDIA WITNESS** CBS and Paramount sought to exclude expert testimony of academic [[https://t.co/GuZqvvImFO|Henry Jenkins]], a professor at the University of Southern California, who has argued that fan works deserve protection under copyright law's [[fair use]] provisions.   * **EXPERT MEDIA WITNESS** CBS and Paramount sought to exclude expert testimony of academic [[https://t.co/GuZqvvImFO|Henry Jenkins]], a professor at the University of Southern California, who has argued that fan works deserve protection under copyright law's [[fair use]] provisions.
  
-==== How Evidence was Gathered ====+===== How Evidence was Gathered =====
  
 Both sides gathered a great deal of potential evidence as part of the [[discovery]] process in the case, some of which has already been submitted to the court as part of both sides' request from the judge to issue a [[summary judgment]] in their favor to avoid or limit the scope of the trial [[anatomy_of_the_case|scheduled]] to begin January 31, 2017. Both sides gathered a great deal of potential evidence as part of the [[discovery]] process in the case, some of which has already been submitted to the court as part of both sides' request from the judge to issue a [[summary judgment]] in their favor to avoid or limit the scope of the trial [[anatomy_of_the_case|scheduled]] to begin January 31, 2017.