Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
compel_discovery [2016/09/30 05:16] – [Evidence for the Defense] Carlos Pedraza | compel_discovery [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | <wrap lo>//See also: [[discovery|Discovery]] and [[protective_order|Protective Order]]//</ | + | <wrap lo>//See also: [[discovery_order|Court Orders Studios to Turn Over Documents]] and [[protective_order|Protective Order]]//</ |
- | Axanar' | + | Axanar' |
- | In a 62-page joint filing September 29, 2016, the two sides asked for an October 21 hearing before | + | In a 62-page joint filing September 29, 2016, the two sides asked for an [[discovery_order|October 21 hearing]] before |
===== Evidence for the Defense ===== | ===== Evidence for the Defense ===== | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* The 50-year chain of title for Star Trek's copyrights may have broken links imperiling the studios' | * The 50-year chain of title for Star Trek's copyrights may have broken links imperiling the studios' | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | [{{ ::ledger.jpg?300|Ledger. | + | {{ :gandtshow.jpg?nolink& |
+ | <wrap lo> | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | |||
==== The Role of Financial Records ==== | ==== The Role of Financial Records ==== | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==== Plaintiffs' | ==== Plaintiffs' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right round download 300px> | ||
+ | <wrap lo> | ||
+ | </ | ||
Ranahan, of [[Winston & Strawn]], complained her counterparts at [[Loeb & Loeb]], the plaintiffs' | Ranahan, of [[Winston & Strawn]], complained her counterparts at [[Loeb & Loeb]], the plaintiffs' | ||
Line 73: | Line 77: | ||
CBS and Paramount attorneys also pointed to "the commercial nature of [Axanar' | CBS and Paramount attorneys also pointed to "the commercial nature of [Axanar' | ||
- | * Use of " | + | * Use of " |
* Accepting donations that resulted in providing perks that included infringing Star Trek-branded merchandise. | * Accepting donations that resulted in providing perks that included infringing Star Trek-branded merchandise. | ||
* Paying " | * Paying " | ||
Line 96: | Line 100: | ||
The defense asserted throughout its motion that Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry had originally owned the copyright. By all accounts, Roddenberry never possessed the copyright; he created Star Trek as a work-for-hire under Desilu Productions, | The defense asserted throughout its motion that Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry had originally owned the copyright. By all accounts, Roddenberry never possessed the copyright; he created Star Trek as a work-for-hire under Desilu Productions, | ||
+ | ==== Undisclosed Proceeds ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now in possession of an [[guidelines-podcast|audit]] of Axanar' | ||
==== Another View of Market Harm ==== | ==== Another View of Market Harm ==== | ||
Line 115: | Line 122: | ||
<WRAP right round info 50%> | <WRAP right round info 50%> | ||
- | <wrap lo> | + | <wrap lo> |
</ | </ | ||
Line 142: | Line 149: | ||
=== Star Wars Fan Films === | === Star Wars Fan Films === | ||
- | Curiously, the motion includes a request related to Star Wars fan productions, | + | Curiously, the motion includes a request related to Star Wars fan productions, |
==== Missing Titles ==== | ==== Missing Titles ==== |