Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
appeal_statement [2017/01/05 11:33] – [Boilerplate Assurance] edit to tighten Carlos Pedraza | appeal_statement [2017/01/05 11:55] – [Minimizing Legal Travails] Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<wrap lo>See also: // | <wrap lo>See also: // | ||
- | Axanar told its donors it not only plans to to pursue its [[copyright infringement]] case to the Ninth Circuit [[appeal_fact_check|Court of Appeals]] but that its pro bono law firm, [[Winston & Strawn]] would stand by the beleaguered project. | + | Axanar told its donors it not only plans to to pursue its [[copyright infringement]] case to the Ninth Circuit [[appeal_fact_check|Court of Appeals]] but that its pro bono law firm, [[Winston & Strawn]], would stand by the beleaguered project. |
{{page> | {{page> | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
What the judge left for the jury to determine was whether a subjective, " | What the judge left for the jury to determine was whether a subjective, " | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Peters: Axanar 'Just a Hobby' === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Meanwhile, through his surrogate blogger at Fan Film Factor, Peters reportedly attempted to minimize the importance of the case to him: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > Alec told me earlier today, it's just a lawsuit. It's just business. It was essentially a hobby for him. He didn't work in the film business before Axanar, and if he loses this case, he likely won't work in the film business afterward. That's not a sinking ship; it's just status quo.(([[http:// | ||
<WRAP right round box 50%> | <WRAP right round box 50%> | ||
// | // | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | |||
==== Boilerplate Assurance ==== | ==== Boilerplate Assurance ==== | ||