Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
second_letter [2019/04/16 14:32] – Carlos Pedrazasecond_letter [2019/04/21 17:13] – [Delays] format fix Carlos Pedraza
Line 36: Line 36:
 Dorros warned Dever’s client off such behavior: Dorros warned Dever’s client off such behavior:
  
-> I will not go into detail as to the various and multiple other instances of quite clear defamation by Mr. Peters relative to Mr. Burnett, however I must again insist that you ensure that your client immediately cease and desist from any such further conduct and remove/take down any and all similar language … from any location accessible by third parties, including without limitation, the Internet, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, the Axanar Productions website, or otherwise.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 3, 4/12/19.))+> I will not go into detail as to the various and multiple [[yout>IDDI8KeRsug|other instances]] of quite clear defamation by Mr. Peters relative to Mr. Burnett, however I must again insist that you ensure that your client immediately cease and desist from any such further conduct and remove/take down any and all similar language … from any location accessible by third parties, including without limitation, the Internet, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, the Axanar Productions website, or otherwise.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 3, 4/12/19.))
  
 [{{ :captain-peters-1.jpg|**Alec Peters**}}] [{{ :captain-peters-1.jpg|**Alec Peters**}}]
Line 49: Line 49:
   * **First delay**: It took Peters 25 days to serve Burnett, a California resident with the legal summons for the Georgia lawsuit.   * **First delay**: It took Peters 25 days to serve Burnett, a California resident with the legal summons for the Georgia lawsuit.
   * **Badly served**: Neither Peters nor his attorney have filed the required proof of service with the court. Without such proof filed with the court, Burnett isn’t required to reply to the suit, effectively grinding Peters’ legal action to a halt. According to Dorros:   * **Badly served**: Neither Peters nor his attorney have filed the required proof of service with the court. Without such proof filed with the court, Burnett isn’t required to reply to the suit, effectively grinding Peters’ legal action to a halt. According to Dorros:
 +
 > While indeed Mr. Burnett appears to have been served with papers in the action — this should not be taken as a concession as to whether such service in fact is proper or sufficient and thus for the moment our position is that service is improper and/or insufficient.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 1, 4/12/19.)) > While indeed Mr. Burnett appears to have been served with papers in the action — this should not be taken as a concession as to whether such service in fact is proper or sufficient and thus for the moment our position is that service is improper and/or insufficient.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 1, 4/12/19.))
  
Line 94: Line 95:
 === Missing Plaintiff === === Missing Plaintiff ===
  
-Dorros’ letter also observed Peters’ settlement proposal did not include the other plaintiff in the suit, Axanar Productions Inc. "It would need to be a party to the settlement agreement."((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 1, 4/12/19.))+Dorros’ letter also observed Peters’ settlement proposal did not include the other plaintiff in the suit, Axanar Productions Inc. "It would need to be a party to the settlement agreement," he wrote.((Letter from Torin Dorros to H. Michael Dever, Re: Alec Peters and Axanar Productions, Inc. v. Robert Meyer Burnett, p. 1, 4/12/19.))
  
-Despite being named a defendant in the suit against Burnett, Axanar Productions Inc. may not have standing to sue in Georgia courts. It remained a California corporation, and is not registered to do business in Georgia.+Despite being named a defendant in the suit against Burnett, Axanar Productions Inc. may not have standing to sue in Georgia courts. It remains a California corporation, and is not registered to do business in Georgia.
  
 ===== Digital Assets ===== ===== Digital Assets =====