Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
protective_order [2016/10/02 17:19] – adds byline Carlos Pedrazaprotective_order [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 16: Line 16:
 > Parties now undertake discovery away from the court. Experience has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of discovery in many cases. Parties are often more willing to produce requested discovery when they know that such production does not necessarily make the information public.(([[http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/confidentialdisc.pdf/$file/confidentialdisc.pdf|Federal Justice Center: Confidential Discovery — A Pocket Guide on Protective Orders]], (2012), p.1.)) > Parties now undertake discovery away from the court. Experience has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of discovery in many cases. Parties are often more willing to produce requested discovery when they know that such production does not necessarily make the information public.(([[http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/confidentialdisc.pdf/$file/confidentialdisc.pdf|Federal Justice Center: Confidential Discovery — A Pocket Guide on Protective Orders]], (2012), p.1.))
  
-The order in [[lawsuit|this case]], was agreed to by attorneys for the plaintiffs, [[CBS]] and [[Paramount Pictures]], and the defendants, //Axanar// producer [[Alec Peters]] and [[Axanar Productions]]. Federal magistrate Judge Charles Eick approved the order the same day.+The order in [[lawsuit|this case]], was agreed to by attorneys for the plaintiffs, [[CBS]] and [[Paramount Pictures]], and the defendants, //Axanar// producer [[Alec Peters]] and [[Axanar Productions]]. Federal magistrate [[federal_magistrate_judge_charles_f._eick|Judge Charles F. Eick]] approved the order the same day.
  
-The order, filed in federal district court, defines the type of evidence each side agrees deserves protection, how it is labeled 'confidential,' and who gets to see it before trial. It also provides for challenges by either side about the confidentiality of the information, to be decided by [[judge_r._gary_klausner|the judge]], before going on to be disclosed publicly at trial.+The order, filed in federal district court, defines the type of evidence each side agrees deserves protection, how it is labeled 'confidential,' and who gets to see it before trial. It also provides for challenges by either side about the confidentiality of the information, to be decided by [[judge_r._gary_klausner|the judge]], before going on to be disclosed publicly at trial or in support of pre-trial motions.
  
 Such orders are intended to "expedite discovery, reduce costs, and protect the parties in the event of inadvertent disclosure."(([[http://www.smithmoorelaw.com/Confidentiality-and-Protective-Orders-08-05-2013|"Confidentiality and Protective Orders," by Bailey King, et al.]], Smith Moore Leatherwood, DRIs for the Defense, 8/5/13.)) Such orders are intended to "expedite discovery, reduce costs, and protect the parties in the event of inadvertent disclosure."(([[http://www.smithmoorelaw.com/Confidentiality-and-Protective-Orders-08-05-2013|"Confidentiality and Protective Orders," by Bailey King, et al.]], Smith Moore Leatherwood, DRIs for the Defense, 8/5/13.))