Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
peters_outrage [2019/04/30 21:04] – [Raising the Stakes] Carlos Pedraza | peters_outrage [2019/04/30 21:24] (current) – [Counterclaims] Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<WRAP right round download 320px> | <WRAP right round download 320px> | ||
- | < | + | <wrap em>< |
<fs smaller> | <fs smaller> | ||
• From attorney Torin Dorros, including emails from Mike Bawden and Alec Peters as exhibits). [[dorros_letter_april_29|{{: | • From attorney Torin Dorros, including emails from Mike Bawden and Alec Peters as exhibits). [[dorros_letter_april_29|{{: | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
> All your bullshit counter claims are absurd. I have three lawyers looking at this case and they all say the same thing: we are going to crush Rob as I have all the facts and proof for every claim behind me. Rob's YouTube videos alone are a huge defamation claim. And when the judge sees what the settlement offer you rejected is, it will not go well for Rob.((Alec Peters email to Mike Bawden, 4/27/19.)) | > All your bullshit counter claims are absurd. I have three lawyers looking at this case and they all say the same thing: we are going to crush Rob as I have all the facts and proof for every claim behind me. Rob's YouTube videos alone are a huge defamation claim. And when the judge sees what the settlement offer you rejected is, it will not go well for Rob.((Alec Peters email to Mike Bawden, 4/27/19.)) | ||
- | Given the settlement offer' | + | Given the settlement offer' |
Peters also seemed to relish the possibility of examining each party' | Peters also seemed to relish the possibility of examining each party' |