Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
peters_kickstarter_facts [2017/01/06 17:39] – [Axanar's 'Non Profit' Status] Carlos Pedrazapeters_kickstarter_facts [2017/03/08 20:58] – [Axanar's 'Non Profit' Status] Carlos Pedraza
Line 80: Line 80:
  
 <wrap em>FALSE</wrap> **It's About Profit** Peters has used the "IRS definition" of profit as justification for why Axanar's revenue-generating activities should not count as "making money" from its use of Star Trek's intellectual property. **AxaMonitor** has already [[axanar_myths|debunked]] this notion by: <wrap em>FALSE</wrap> **It's About Profit** Peters has used the "IRS definition" of profit as justification for why Axanar's revenue-generating activities should not count as "making money" from its use of Star Trek's intellectual property. **AxaMonitor** has already [[axanar_myths|debunked]] this notion by:
-  * Documenting Axanar Productions status as a for-profit corporation in the state of California.+  * Documenting Axanar Productions' status as a for-profit corporation in the state of California.
   * Demonstrating Peters' definition of the term 'profit' isn't relevant to the direct financial benefit he is alleged to have gained from copyright infringement.   * Demonstrating Peters' definition of the term 'profit' isn't relevant to the direct financial benefit he is alleged to have gained from copyright infringement.