Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
fan_film_factor [2016/10/27 06:20] – [The Two Pillars] adds pull quote Carlos Pedrazafan_film_factor [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 46: Line 46:
 <wrap em>PARTLY TRUE</wrap> Lane is perfectly correct that the judge granted the defense's requests in the interest of fair play, but that's a far cry from assuming Eick was making a qualitative determination about how "damaging" the evidence might be. His interest is in ensuring both sides get all the evidence they're entitled to in order to build the case they want. That interest has nothing to do with judging how effective that case will be when all is said and done. That's up to the jury and/or the trial judge, [[judge_r._gary_klausner|R. Gary Klausner]], to eventually decide. <wrap em>PARTLY TRUE</wrap> Lane is perfectly correct that the judge granted the defense's requests in the interest of fair play, but that's a far cry from assuming Eick was making a qualitative determination about how "damaging" the evidence might be. His interest is in ensuring both sides get all the evidence they're entitled to in order to build the case they want. That interest has nothing to do with judging how effective that case will be when all is said and done. That's up to the jury and/or the trial judge, [[judge_r._gary_klausner|R. Gary Klausner]], to eventually decide.
  
-[{{ ::marbles.jpg?300|**ALL THE MARBLES** In a court order, Axanar's attorneys won a lot of evidence from the studios, but its focus on actual damages neglects the plaintiffs' right to choose another basis for calculating damages.}}]+[{{ ::marbles.jpg?300|**ALL THE MARBLES** In a court order, Axanar's attorneys won a lot of evidence from the studios, but its focus on actual damages neglects the plaintiffs' right to choose another basis for calculating damages. //Photo/Rich Bowen//}}]
  
 ===== Bounty of Information ===== ===== Bounty of Information =====
Line 66: Line 66:
  
 <WRAP right box 50%> <WRAP right box 50%>
-//**__« Axanar's argument, 'We've earned so little compared to your billions,' essentially claims stealing is OK so long as we're doing it from someone rich. »__**//+//**__« Axanar's argument, 'We've earned so little compared to your billions,' essentially claims stealing is OK so long as you do it to someone rich. »__**//
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 76: Line 76:
 === Actual Harm === === Actual Harm ===
  
-Market harm is only one of the four factors to be weighed in a fair use analysis, and while it's important, market harm and actual damages are not synonymous, and Jonathan seems to be equating the two.+Market harm is only one of the four factors to be weighed in a fair use analysis, and while it's important, market harm and actual damages are not synonymous, and Lane seems to be equating the two.
  
 Lane characterized the plaintiffs' case for damages as 'actual' first and 'statutory' as a fallback. But the pleadings don't back up that interpretation. In fact, the law gives the plaintiffs, even up to the time that judgment is rendered, the choice of electing statutory damages instead of actual.(([[http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#504|Title 17 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 5, §504 Remedies for infringement: Damages and Profits]], retrieved 10/27/16.)) Of course, for the defense, focusing on actual damages allows them to minimize the infringement while amplifying the defendants' hopes for a ruling of fair use. Lane characterized the plaintiffs' case for damages as 'actual' first and 'statutory' as a fallback. But the pleadings don't back up that interpretation. In fact, the law gives the plaintiffs, even up to the time that judgment is rendered, the choice of electing statutory damages instead of actual.(([[http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#504|Title 17 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 5, §504 Remedies for infringement: Damages and Profits]], retrieved 10/27/16.)) Of course, for the defense, focusing on actual damages allows them to minimize the infringement while amplifying the defendants' hopes for a ruling of fair use.