Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
does [2016/06/09 01:35]
Carlos Pedraza edits for clarity
does [2009/05/26 00:24] (current)
Line 12: Line 12:
 <wrap em>​UPDATE</​wrap>​ According to the court'​s May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings"​ in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named. <wrap em>​UPDATE</​wrap>​ According to the court'​s May 10, 2016, scheduling order, both sides had until May 25 to "to join other parties or to amend the pleadings"​ in the case. That date passed with none of the Does named.
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
 +
 +==== Why Weren'​t Any Does Named? ====
  
 <WRAP right round info 50%> <WRAP right round info 50%>
 <wrap lo>This section, **Why Weren'​t Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation.</​wrap></​WRAP>​ <wrap lo>This section, **Why Weren'​t Any Does Named?** features opinion and informed speculation.</​wrap></​WRAP>​
- 
-==== Why Weren'​t Any Does Named? ==== 
  
 In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]],​ both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.)) In their May 2, 2016, [[joint statement]] to the judge ahead of the case's [[scheduling conference]],​ both sides indicated a reluctance to adding parties to the suit.((Rule 26 Joint Report by Plaintiffs and Defendants, p. 2 line 12.))