Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
dismissal_denied [2016/05/10 12:44] – created Carlos Pedrazadismissal_denied [2016/05/19 12:57] – Carlos Pedraza
Line 16: Line 16:
 In issuing the order, Klausner included a sly reference to Vulcan philosophy: In issuing the order, Klausner included a sly reference to Vulcan philosophy:
  
-> Although the Court declines to address whether Plaintiffs’ Claims <wrap hi>will prosper</wrap> at this time, the Court does find Plaintiffs’ claims will <wrap hi>live long</wrap> enough to survive Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED.+> Although the Court declines to address whether Plaintiffs’ Claims <wrap hi>will prosper</wrap> at this time, the Court does find Plaintiffs’ claims will <wrap hi>live long</wrap> enough to survive Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED.((Civil Minutes, Judge R. Gary Klausner's Order to Deny Motion to Dismiss, p. 8 §V, “Conclusion,” 5/9/16.))
  
 With the dismissal motion disposed of, the case proceeded forward to an expected filing by Axanar's law firm, [[Winston & Strawn]] of its answer to the [[summary_of_the_lawsuit|legal complaint]] on or before May 25, 14 days after the judge's ruling. With the dismissal motion disposed of, the case proceeded forward to an expected filing by Axanar's law firm, [[Winston & Strawn]] of its answer to the [[summary_of_the_lawsuit|legal complaint]] on or before May 25, 14 days after the judge's ruling.
-