Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
discovery [2016/07/13 15:54] – layout fix Carlos Pedraza | discovery [2018/12/08 11:48] (current) – Carlos Pedraza | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
====== Discovery ====== | ====== Discovery ====== | ||
{{TOC}} | {{TOC}} | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | //**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user> | ||
+ | </ | ||
/* <wrap lo>//See also: [[http:// | /* <wrap lo>//See also: [[http:// | ||
Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
Discovery can be obtained from parties not directly named in a suit using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. | Discovery can be obtained from parties not directly named in a suit using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. | ||
- | <WRAP right round tip 50%> | + | <WRAP right round tip 320px> |
[{{ : | [{{ : | ||
- | **DISCOVERY UNDERWAY** Axanar attorney [[Erin Ranahan]] told [[http:// | + | <wrap lo>**DISCOVERY UNDERWAY** Axanar attorney [[Erin Ranahan]] told [[http:// |
</ | </ | ||
Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
Certain types of information are generally protected from discovery, including: | Certain types of information are generally protected from discovery, including: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP right round important 50%> | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | <wrap lo> | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
* Information that is privileged. | * Information that is privileged. | ||
* Work product of the opposing party. | * Work product of the opposing party. | ||
Line 38: | Line 47: | ||
==== Scheduling Conference ==== | ==== Scheduling Conference ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{page> | ||
+ | |||
<wrap lo>//See also: [[Scheduling conference]]//</ | <wrap lo>//See also: [[Scheduling conference]]//</ | ||
Line 64: | Line 76: | ||
According to the Federal Justice Center, evidence formally submitted to the court, either at trial or for consideration by the judge, is generally eligible for public disclosure, unless parties successfully seek a protective order. | According to the Federal Justice Center, evidence formally submitted to the court, either at trial or for consideration by the judge, is generally eligible for public disclosure, unless parties successfully seek a protective order. | ||
- | > Parties now undertake discovery away from the court. Experience has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of discovery in many cases. Parties are often more willing to produce requested discovery when they know that such production does not necessarily make the information public.(([[http:// | + | < |
- | + | <wrap lo>Portions of this article were adapted from the article, **[[wp> | |
- | <WRAP round info> | + | |
- | Portions of this article were adapted from the article, **[[wp> | + | |
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | > Parties now undertake discovery away from the court. Experience has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of discovery in many cases. Parties are often more willing to produce requested discovery when they know that such production does not necessarily make the information public.(([[http:// | ||
---- | ---- | ||
**Keywords** {{tag> | **Keywords** {{tag> |