no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


Previous revision
Last revision
—axanar-accusation [2016/09/15 02:30] – adds byline Carlos Pedraza
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP box>
 +{{::daily-views-both-2.jpg?nolink|}} \\
 +<wrap lo>**SIDE BY SIDE** Two graphs compare historical daily viewership for //Star Trek–Horizon// (top) and //Prelude to Axanar//. The large spike at the beginning of each is attributed to their premieres. //Prelude//'s large spikes typically coincide with news events surrounding the controversial Axanar project.</wrap>
 +</WRAP>
  
 +{{TOC}}
 +====== Axanar Accuses Horizon of Buying Views ======
 +
 +**//Horizon Producer Says Accusation ‘Reeks of Jealousy’//**
 +
 +<WRAP>
 +//**__ __**// <wrap lo>**By [[user>cpedraza|Carlos Pedraza]]**</wrap>
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +A few days before //Star Trek–Horizon// moved ahead of //Prelude to Axanar// in YouTube viewership on August 23, 2016, Axanar accused //Horrizon//'s producers of having bought views of its trailer, and suggested the count for the film itself was inflated.
 +
 +<wrap lo>//See also: [[buying-youtube|The Art and Science of Buying YouTube Views]]//</wrap>
 +
 +In a tweet August 20, 2016, Axanar's Twitter account posted:
 +
 +> {{::axanar-twitter.jpg?50 |}}<wrap lo>**Axanar** [[twit>StarTrekAxanar/status/767109486591041538|@axanar]] You would have to compare real stats not views that Horizon bought, like its 3m views for its trailer.</wrap>
 +
 +The tweet came a few days after **AxaMonitor** observed dozens of [[dummy_tweets|duplicate tweets]] from dummy accounts pointing people to Axanar's short film, //Prelude to Axanar//, and after **AxaMonitor** published an article by editor Carlos Pedraza, "[[horizon-matters|Why Horizon's Success Matters]]."
 +
 +[{{ :undefined:horizon-trailer-1.jpg?direct&300|**PURCHASED VIEWS** While Axanar accuses //Horizon// of buying 3.4 million views for its trailer, YouTube data since 2014 show only a burst of activity upon its release and just prior to the film's February 2016 release. (Click to view full size.)}}]
 +
 +The article noted that //Horizon// was due to surpass //Prelude//'s 2.5 million views, challenging Axanar producer [[Alec Peters]]' characterization of //Prelude// as "the most successful Trek film ever"(([[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxOkhC8-u3s|"Axanar: The $1 Million Star Trek Fan Film CBS Wants to Stop," ReasonTV YouTube]], 7/19/16.)) — "by any metric," added director Robert Meyer Burnett.(([[https://twitter.com/BurnettRM/status/751604413811134469|Robert Meyer Burnett tweet]], 7/8/16.))
 +
 +===== Horizon Producer Responds =====
 +
 +Asked by **AxaMonitor** if he denied buying YouTube views, //Horizon// producer Tommy Kraft replied, "Correct. Never bought any views."((Facebook message from Tommy Kraft to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza, 8/21/16.)) Kraft said he was amused by the accusation, which he said stemmed from "pure jealousy":
 +
 +> I find it amusing that a team with a multi-million dollar budget is accusing me (a person who made a whole feature film on $28,000) of buying views. I'm as surprised as anyone at the growing popularity of Horizon. I never expected this and I certainly never expected the views to keep shooting up less than six months after release. I'm continually amazed by the fact that people keep watching my movie and commenting on it, and <wrap hi>the fact that Axanar has accused me of buying views on it and on my trailers reeks of nothing more than pure jealousy.</wrap>"((Facebook message from Tommy Kraft to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza, 8/21/16.)) <wrap lo>[//empahsis added//]</wrap>
 +
 +==== Part of Prelude's Crew ====
 +
 +Kraft was also a member of //Prelude//'s crew, credited as the film's digital compositor,(([[imdb>title/tt3572740/fullcredits/|Prelude to Axanar, full credits, IMDb]], retrieved 8/21/16.)) who blended the live action and digital effects(([[https://www.thefoundry.co.uk/products/nuke/about-digital-compositing/|"What is digital compositing," NUKE website]], retrieved 8/21/16.)) to create //Prelude//'s lifelike, award-winning signature look. Despite Axanar's touting its professional crew, Kraft was [[kraft_experience|never paid]] for his efforts.
 +===== Provides No Evidence =====
 +
 +<wrap lo>//See also: [[buying-youtube|The Art and Science of Buying YouTube Views]]//</wrap>
 +
 +It took //Prelude// two years to accumulate its views; //Horizon// took five months. Asked to provide evidence for its accusation against //Horizon//, the Axanar Twitter account instead wrote:
 +
 +> {{:axanar-twitter.jpg?nolink&50 |}}<wrap lo>**Axanar** [[twit>StarTrekAxanar/status/767178436083326976|@startrekaxanar]] Simply compare stats - Views/likes/comments.  You can't have same # of views & 1/2 the comments & likes.(([[twit>StarTrekAxanar/status/767178436083326976|Axanar tweet and replies]] 8/20/16.)) \\ \\
 +{{::mistymills-twitter.jpeg?nolink&50 |}}
 +**Misty Mills** [[twit>mistymills/status/767181515650437120|@mistymills]] Not really a good metric. Last stat I heard was only ~52% of YouTube users even use commenting.</wrap>
 +
 +When another Twitter user asked Axanar for more evidence:
 +
 +> {{::clenard-twitter.jpg?nolink&50 |}}<wrap lo>**Clenard** ‏[[twit>ClenardCmolder/status/767118895710810113|@ClenardCmolder]] Hey @StarTrekAxanar Can you inform us as to how one goes about buying YouTube views? Enquiring minds want to know. \\
 +**Axanar** [[twit>StarTrekAxanar/status/767136165409480704|@startrekaxanar]] Just Google it or ask Tommy Kraft at Horizon. We have never bought YouTube views. \\
 +**Clenard** [[twit>ClenardCmolder/status/767139597927067648|@ClenardCmolder]] I am also pretty sure that unless you can prove the alleged purchase, it qualifies as slander or libel.(([[twit>ClenardCmolder/status/767118895710810113|Clenard tweet and replies]], 8/20/16.))</wrap>
 +
 +Axanar didn't tweet further on the topic of evidence at the time this article was posted.((posted 8/20/16))
 +
 +===== Axanar Director: ‘Nobody Cares’ =====
 +
 +For his part, Burnett refused to identify which metrics justified his claim of most successful: “Nobody cares how many views //Prelude to Axanar// has on YouTube … except you,” Burnett told **AxaMonitor**.(([[https://twitter.com/BurnettRM/status/766508150883168256|Robert Meyer Burnett tweet]], 8/18/16.))
 +
 +[{{ :horizon-stats.jpg?direct&300|**NIPPING AT THE HEELS** of //Prelude to Axanar//‘s astonishing viewership is upstart fan film //Star Trek–Horizon//, which eventually surpassed //Prelude//‘s views on August 23. (Click to view full size)}}]
 +
 +> {{::axamonitor-twitter.jpg?nolink&50 |}}<wrap lo>**[[twit>AxaMonitor/status/766518938226221056|@AxaMonitor]]**: “Seriously though, I’m interested in the metrics you used in claiming Prelude to Axanar is the most successful fan film.” \\
 +**@BurnettRM**: I leave that up to you. \\
 +**@AxaMonitor**: So. Just boast, and then … “We do not discuss it with outsiders…”? \\
 +**@BurnettRM**: C’mon now…you’re the expert…again…I ask..what do YOU think?</wrap>(([[twit>AxaMonitor/status/766518938226221056|AxaMonitor tweet and replies]], 8/18/16))
 +
 +When asked why he made the boast if he wasn't going to substantiate it, Burnett tweeted, "So people who might not watch the film will tune in and see for themselves. <wrap hi>That's showmanship. That's Hollywood</wrap>."(([[https://twitter.com/BurnettRM/status/767075331656122369|Robert Meyer Burnett tweet]], 8/20/16.)) <wrap lo>[//emphasis added//]</wrap>
 +
 +===== Reaction =====
 +
 +Asked on Twitter if he believed Axanar's accusation against //Horizon//,(([[twit>AxaMonitor/status/767122875014795264|AxaMonitor tweet]], 8/20/16.)) Burnett remained silent.
 +
 +==== Watch ====
 +Just before 2 pm PDT, August 23, //Star Trek–Horizon// overtook //Prelude to Axanar//. //Horizon// had logged 2,565,757 views, compared to //Prelude// at 2,564,967. Both //Star Trek–Horizon// and //Prelude to Axanar// are available on YouTube. {{:axamonitor-ico.gif?nolink|}}
 +
 +{{youtube>l94v4YOqxOc?medium|Star Trek – Horizon}} \\ {{youtube>1W1_8IV8uhA?medium|Prelude to Axanar}}
 +----
 +**Keywords** {{tag>fan_films}}