TRIALS AND TRIBBLE-ATIONS A model of the Original Series U.S.S. Enterprise built for the classic 1996 Deep Space Nine episode sold for $235,000, with most of the proceeds supposed to go to the widow of the deceased visual effects supervisor Gary Hutzel. Newly revealed documents indicate the deal brokered by Alec Peters’ Propworx company paid Catherine Hutzel only about half what she says she was owed. Photo/Trekcore.com
JULY 8, 2019 | 11 MIN. READ EXCLUDING TIMELINE | 17 MIN. WITH TIMELINE
Preparing to sue many over former employee’s allegations he failed to pay widow in DS9 model sale
Axanar producer Alec Peters allegedly cheated the widow of Star Trek visual effects supervisor Gary Hutzel out of $94,400 she was due from the 2017 sale of her husband’s model of the Original Series U.S.S. Enterprise built for the Deep Space Nine episode, “Trials and Tribble-ations,” according to a former Peters employee.
Gary Hutzel was a beloved member of the crew of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and Battlestar Galactica, among other well-known science fiction TV series. He died in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 2016.
According to Dean Newbury, a former employee of Propworx, Peters’ company obtained a number of models and props on consignment, after Hutzel’s death, from his wife, Catherine, in 2017. At the time Propworx, though owned by Peters, was operated by Jarrod Hunt, who has since opened his own prop sales company.
See also: Trial in Peters' Prop Sale, Defamation Lawsuit Set for 2020 and Robert Meyer Burnett's Axanar Tell-All
Documents show Propworx sold the 6-foot-long Enterprise model to Nevada-based Hero Prop for $235,000 in November 2017. According to their deal, Peters was to pay Mrs. Hutzel 80 percent of the proceeds from the sale, or $188,000.
Instead, according to Mrs. Hutzel, Peters paid her only $100,000.
SIGN UP You can subscribe to AxaMonitor Daily to be the first to read news stories like this from AxaMonitor.
Peters’ dealings with Mrs. Hutzel first came to public light in the now-infamous tell-all New Year’s YouTube videos by former Axanar director Robert Meyer Burnett, in which he revealed many behind-the-scenes problems with Peters’ management of the Axanar project.
Peters himself went on to obliquely repeat (and deny) allegations about his dealings with Mrs. Hutzel in a recent episode of his YouTube livestream, Axanar: Confidential.
Suing AxaMonitor
Alec Peters’ threats of litigation over the Hutzel issue now includes AxaMonitor, as well as his former business associates. After refusing the opportunity to tell his side of the story, he stated:
“Please know that if you publish anything about my business at Propworx, I guarantee I will be suing you for cyberstalking and cyberbullying. I have already consulted with specialty counsel and you have done enough to warrant a lawsuit. The fact that you dig into every business dealing I have is evidence your deranged stalking of me.”1)
Peters said his attorney would be contacting AxaMonitor.2)
Asked to comment on this story, Peters refused, citing “ongoing litigation against [Hero Prop co-owner] Tiana Armstrong and Rob Burnett (who is being sued in part for defamation in claiming I screwed Cathy Hutzel).”3)
UPDATE On July 10, Peters’ Nevada attorney (representing him in the Hero Prop lawsuit) emailed a cease and desist letter to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza demanding all false statements about Alec Peters be removed from the website. The letter threatened litigation if this wasn’t done by July 20. Read more in AxaMonitor Daily »
Armstrong said when Hero Prop purchased the Hutzel items from Peters she was “unaware that they were on consignment. It was truly painful for me to find out the consignor, Cathy Hutzel, was not told the details of the sale for many months after Hero Prop started making payments. I was happy to provide her with a copy of the contract as well as payment receipts. Cathy has a beautiful soul. She’s a schoolteacher, mother and widow and the last person on earth who deserves to be taken advantage of.”4)
In fact, Peters said it was Burnett’s idea to cheat Mrs. Hutzel: “Rob made some allegations that are defamatory and entirely false. (Especially since he advocated screwing Cathy Hutzel the day we received the Enterprise model,” claiming Burnett said, “Sell it for $100,000 and give her $20,000. She’ll never know”.5)
Burnett disputed that: “That’s absurd. I never discussed his prop business with him. To this day, I still don’t understand how all the commission works from a prop sale,” he stated. “He’d moved to Atlanta and I’d resigned from [Axanar] before he made that sale, and he’s claiming I somehow bamboozled him to commit an alleged crime? … I loved Gary! He participated in the TNG docs I produced. He was great to me! Why would I want him to deceive Gary’s WIDOW?!?!?”6)
Timeline of the Enterprise Sale
Peters went on to accuse his former employees, Newbury and Hunt, of fraud: “My attorney will be suing Jarrod Hunt and Dean Newbury for their part in this fraud, as well as Jarrod for fraud committed when he worked at Propworx by him, and Dean for defamation in the Cathy Hutzel matter.”8)
Documents and photos detailing Alec Peters’/Propworx’s dealings with Mrs. Hutzel are included in the Timeline of the Enterprise Sale sidebar.
According to Newbury, who also worked as construction coordinator for Axanar, Peters claimed the amount was justified because so-called repairs to the model totaled $40,000, an amount Newbury disputes. No such repairs were needed, he claimed.
“I have many images of the model in full 360 degrees that … prove the model was perfect at this time [of sale],” Newbury said. “Alec Peters lied and said he paid $40,000 to have it repaired, and used this to justify not paying Cathy in full.”
Newbury is also well known as the builder of the Ares bridge and other sets for Axanar: Unmade, the feature.
« If you publish anything about my business at Propworx, I guarantee I will be suing you for cyberstalking and cyberbullying. » — Alec Peters email to AxaMonitor editor Carlos Pedraza
In fact, it was Hero Prop that paid $40,000, not to repair the model but to retrofit it with LED lights and an electrical system that used standard wall power. “The model was not in need of any other work as it was still in excellent screen-used condition when it was shipped,” Newbury added.
In the meantime, Mrs. Hutzel consigned to Propworx an Orb of the Prophets, a well known Deep Space Nine prop, which Hero Prop also purchased for $8,000. Her 80 percent of that sale should have been $6,400. She reportedly was never paid for the orb. Combined, the Enterprise and orb sales should have netted Mrs. Hutzel a total of $194,400. According to Newbury, she remains owed $94,400.
« Alec Peters lied and said he paid $40,000 to have [the Enterprise] repaired, and used this to justify not paying Cathy in full. » — Dean Newbury, former Propworx & Axanar employee
More details about Peters’ dealings with Mrs. Hutzel surfaced after he threatened to sue the co-owner of Hero Prop, Tiana Armstrong, over the unrelated disputed sale of the Enterprise-E model from Star Trek: First Contact. Armstrong sued him first, on September 21, 2018, for allegedly defaming her in props forums, claiming she had cheated him. Peters countersued on November 7, seeking $165,000 in damages. That case, now in discovery, is scheduled for trial in January 2020.
Armstrong provided Mrs. Hutzel with documentation of how much Hero Prop paid for the Enterprise model, prompting this November 8 email from Mrs. Hutzel to Armstrong:
Thank you for sending me copies of the receipts for the sale of the TOS Enteprise and the Orb of the Prophets. It is obvious I did not receive the money due to me from Alec at Propworx. According to my calculations, I am owed an additional $96,000.9)
Armstrong reportedly offered to assist Mrs. Hutzel get the money she was due from Peters, but Mrs. Hutzel demurred, not wishing, despite her anger over the situation, to become embroiled in a lawsuit.
Armstrong offered instead to set up a GoFundMe to raise the money. According to Newbury, who was present for the phone conversation, Mrs. Hutzel authorized release of this information and told Armstrong to proceed with the fundraiser.
Armstrong also recently took steps to make whole another person wronged by Peters. His 2010 defamation lawsuit against blogger Propworx critic Jason DeBord was dismissed by a judge under California’s SLAPP law.10) The court found Peters’ suit was an attempt to censor, intimidate and silence a critic by burdening him with legal costs. DeBord won a $26,000 judgment Peters never paid; Peters also didn’t pay his attorney in that case. Armstrong bought DeBord’s judgment, legally empowering her to pursue Peters for payment.
However, shortly after these conversations in November 2018, Mrs. Hutzel broke contact with Armstrong and others who had advocated on her behalf. Mrs. Hutzel did not respond to AxaMonitor‘s attempt to reach her.
“She has not been heard from by anyone involved for some time, and many attempts to contact her by phone, e-mail, and even visiting her home, have proven unfruitful,” Newbury said of the grieving widow. “It is clear that Cathy does not wish to be contacted regarding this matter, and everyone understands that she has deeply personal reasons for this decision.”
In light of her breaking contact, Newbury said it’s unknown if she has spoken with Peters, or if he has made any additional payments. Peters refused to comment on the topic when contacted by AxaMonitor on Sunday.
The Hutzel sale is another in what appears to be an emerging pattern of financial and legal disputes between Peters and his critics, including a growing number of former business associates:
COMMENT & SHARE
Discuss this article in AxaMonitor's Facebook group or share on:
Keywords